Given the vast numbers posted in Ontario after the first couple of years of regulated iGaming in Ontario, it bodes the question of whether other provinces will follow suit.
The main benefit of regulation is the opportunity to generate revenue. Right now, in other parts of Canada, online gamblers are channelling funds to offshore betting sites, which doesn’t benefit the province in any way.
Also, when playing at offshore iGaming sites, there are issues around trust and accountability. If a casino isn’t licensed in Canada, how can a bettor attain accountability if something goes wrong?
From this perspective, the presence of a regulatory body within each province makes sense. It means that players have a way of reporting misconduct and malpractice, making iGaming safer for all.
On the other hand, some people feel that regulation, or overregulation, is prohibitive for the iGaming space.
For instance, some punters complain about some of the regulatory processes laid out by the UK Gambling Commission, noting that they discourage players from placing bets. This is particularly true of Know Your Customer (KYC) regulatory processes, which are often overly burdensome for online bettors.
The key is to strive for balance, as is the case in Ontario. The creation of the ACGO and IGO means Canadian operators can legally offer iGaming in the state, enabling the province to collect revenue from gambling. It also means that players have a source of accountability if something goes wrong.